Immunogenetic Studies and Humoral Reactivity in an Affected COVID-19 First Wave Family

Introduction

The Covid-19 pandemic has been divided into different infection periods (waves) [1]. The first wave started in Europe mid-January 2020 and was characterized initially by dedicated hotspots of infections, from which the virus spread to the general population [2]. The second and the possibly third wave are characterized by viral mutations and possible increased virulence. Even during the first wave mutations like the spike gene D614G with higher infectiousness evolved [3]. Earlier it was stated that blood group O might be to a certain degree protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection or at least protects from a severe course of COVID-19 [4]. We started a local cooperative study on the influence of immunogenetic factors on disease occurrence, spreading, and severity. Here, we report on HLA, blood group, and humoral antiviral immunity data of a SARS-CoV-2-infected family during the first wave of the pandemic disease.

Material and Methods

Our laboratory is accredited for the PCR technology and antibody detection by Luminex technology by the European Federation for Immunogenetics and participated successfully in several external proficiency testing exercises on HLA typing by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Regarding this technology we used the AlloSeq® Tx 17 from CareDx, San Fransisco, CA, USA, for HLA typing. The sequencing was performed on Miseq from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA), following strictly the manufactures recommendations. Alternatively Real Time PCR was used. In addition to the “classical” loci HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 DQA1, DQB1, DPA1 and DPB1, also typed for HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, HLA-H, MICA and MICB. The results of HLA-F and H were not informative and therefore not reported here.

ABO and Rh typing were performed using the PCR sequence specific priming for blood groups of BAG, Lich, Germany, following the manufactures recommendations.

The LAB ScreenTM COVID Plus assay is Luminex® based from One Lambda, West Hills CA, USA. It was strictly followed the manufactures recommendations and used the proposed cutoff values as given by the manufacturer to quote a given value as positive or negative. The assay consists of antigenic determinants bound to polystyrene beads and used in the Luminex® set up (LX200, IS 2.3). The assay detects simultaneously the presence of 5 different SARS-CoV-2 targets and 6 additional coronavirus targets for antibodies present in the subject serum (modified from One Lambda (https://www.onelamdba.com)).

The study was accepted by the ethical committee of our hospital (195/20e-ek). After detailed explanation of the study and investigation the agreement of the family´s legal guardians was obtained by signing the informed consent. For the study, EDTA and serum samples were taken according to the study documents (provided as supplemental material) in case of need.

Results

Family LEI-01:

The family consists of the mother (M), her two daughters (C1, 16 years old and C2, 13 years old) from a previous partnership, her current partner (F2 and a mutual daughter (F2M C1, 17 months). All members of the family were tested by SARS-CoV2 PCR assay according to WHO standards (https://www.WHO.int; https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/latest-evidence/diagnostic-testing). All were positive with exception of C1. All family members were admitted to the hospital. F2 had severe respiratory problems with fever and oxygen was administrated. M had mild cold symptoms with pneumonia but no fever. C2 had mild fever and cold symptoms, while C1 and F2M C1 were asymptomatic (Table 2). NB the family shares housing. HLA and blood group typing were performed by molecular means. In addition, a novel Covid antibody assay was used, in which five SARS-CoV2 specific antigens was included as targets for the antibodies, and six additional human specific antigens of other coronavirus than SARS-CoV2 were used in parallel (Table 1).

Table 1: Antibody targets in the assay.

Target

Description

SARS-CoV-2 Spike

Extra Cellular Domain (ECD)

SARS-CoV-2 SpikeS1

S1 Domain

SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD

Receptor Binding Domain

SARS-CoV-2 SpikeS2

S2 Domain

SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein

Nucleocapsid Protein

HCOV-229E Spike S1

Common Cold Human Coronavirus 229E

HCoV-HKUl SpikeS1

Common Cold Human Coronavirus Hong Kong Ul

HCOV-NL63 Spike S1

Common Cold Human Coronavirus Netherland 63

HCOV-OC43 Spike S1

Common Cold Human Coronavirus Organ Culture43

MERS-CoV Spike S1

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

SARS-CoV Spike S1

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndroma Coronavirus (2003)

Table 2: Symptoms of family members who have Covid-19.

 

F2

M

F2M C1

C2

duration of symptoms

10 days

14 days

no*

1 day

fever

yes, max. 39,5°C

no

no*

yes, 38°C

headache

yes

yes

no*

not known

body aches

yes

yes

no*

not known

tiredness

yes

yes

no*

not known

cough

yes

no

no*

not known

runny nose

no

yes

no*

not known

hoarseness

no

no

no*

not known

sore throat

no

no

no*

not known

pneumonia

yes

yes

no*

not known

sinus discomfort

no

no

no*

not known

dizziness

no

no

no*

not known

taste/smell disorders

yes, since day 4 until January 2021

yes

no*

yes, lightly

depressive moods

no

no

no*

not known

skin redness

no

no

no*

not known

skin vesicles

no

no

no*

not known

nausea/vomiting

no

no

no*

not known

abdominal pain

no

no

no*

not known

diarrhea

yes

no

no*

not known

constipation

no

no

no*

not known

hair loss

yes

yes

no*

not known

Hospitalized, hospital days

yes/16 days

yes/not known**

yes/not known**

not known

oxygen supply

yes, 2l/min

no

no*

not known

Invasive/non-invasive ventilation

no

no

no*

not known

medication for treatment during infection

not known

not known

none

not known

long-term medication

none

Cardesartan

none

not known

other

fungal infection

hip pain, increased blood pressure, myocarditis

no*

not known

*) observations of the parents; **no treatment needed

The results of the HLA typing of the family are depicted in Table 3. The HLA haplotypes of the first partner of the mother are deduced. The F2M C1 child was typed for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1 in 1-field resolution. The remaining results were deduced from the inherited haplotype C from M and E from F2. No sharing of haplotypes was observed. However, since the C1 and C2 daughters inherited different haplotypes from the mother one could speculate that an immunogenetic component might influence the severity of the Covid-19 infection. The asymptomatic F2M C1 child inherited the same haplotype as the C1 and could represent a protective haplotype.

Table 3: HLA typing of the family LEI-01.

We also performed the definition of the blood groups by sequence specific priming PCR, with exception of F2 and M. Their typing was done by usual serological manner. The results are shown in Table 4. Blood group O was shown to be rather protective towards SARS-CoV2 [4]. Since all members of the family are BGO no conclusions are drawn.

Table 4: ABO and Rh typing of the family.

 

SARS CoV2 PCR

ABO

 

RH

F2

Positive

0

nd

CcDEe

M

Positive

0

nd

CCDee

F2M Cl

Positive

01

01v

CcDDEe

Cl

Negative

01

01v

CCDDee

C2

Positive

01

01v

CCDDee

Finally, the reactivity of the serum antibodies towards the different SARS-CoV-2 antigens and those from epidemic coronaviruses were analyzed. The results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Antibody reactivity towards SARS-CoV2 and other coronavirus antigens (shaded boxes indicate positive results).

All members of the family with exception of the C1 showed positive reactions against all five SARS-CoV2 targets. Because of the negative PCR assay, a negative antibody assay for C1 is plausible.

Discussion

The family LEI-01 came to our Institution to participate in our local cooperative study. The members of this family live together and are prone to cluster infections like COVID-19. The C1 individual had no infection as proven by negative PCR and lack of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 while antibodies against epidemic coronaviruses were detected. M and the F2M C1 child had mild symptoms or no symptoms at all. The mother was PCR positive and developed antibodies against several SARS-CoV-2 antigens, as also her F2M C1 offspring. The latter had no symptoms. 

Very little is known with regard to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex [57].  It is far too early to define immunogenetic factors in the family presented where the respective individuals had varying degrees of symptoms. However, because of the different affected HLA haplotypes one could speculate that the haplotype inherited from the mother to the C1 child might include a protective factor. These three individuals express the haplotype C including the HLA-A*23:01, B*44:03, C*04:01, DRB1*07:01, DQA1*02:01, DQB1*02:02. We can speculate that this haplotype protects in a way the carriers from SARS-CoV2 infections and severity. Further analyses in a wider patient population will show whether this assumption is correct.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the family and the family members for their acceptance to participate in the study.

References

  1. Cacciapaglia G, Cot C, Sannino F (2020) Second wave COVID-19 pandemics in Europe: a temporal playbook. Sci Rep 10: 15514.  [View]
  2. Robert Schlack, Laura Neuperdt, Heike Hölling, et al. (2020) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related containment measures on the mental health of children and adolescents. Journal of Health Monitoring · 2020 5(4) , RKI, Berlin. [View]
  3. Plante JA, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. (2020) Spike mutation D614G alters SARS-CoV-2 fitness. Nature. [View]
  4. David Ellinghaus, Frauke Degenhardt, Luis Bujanda, et al. (2020) Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 383: 1522–1534.  [View]
  5. Petra Bacher, Elisa Rosati, Daniela Esser et al. (2020) Low-Avidity CD4+ T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Unexposed Individuals and Humans with Severe COVID-19. Immunity 53: 1258–1271.e5.  [View]
  6. Alba Grifoni, Daniela Weiskopf, Sydney Ramirez, et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181: 1489–1501.e15. [View]
  7. Salman Toor, Reem Saleh, Varun Sasidharan Nair, et al. (2020) T?cell responses and therapies against SARS?CoV?2 infection. Immunology 162: 30–43. [View]